Quantcast
Click here to read more...
March 27, 2008
Newsletter:     
Search:        
 
Click Here to Order!
 
Return to Home Page Return to Old Archive Home Page Doctrine, Scripture, Morality, Vocation, Community Identity, Sexuality, Family, Healing, Work Art, Ideas, Technology, Science, Business Politics, Bioethics, Ecology, Justice, Peace Spirituality, Prayers, Poems, and Witness Archive of top news from around the web Columns, Reviews and Personal Essays What is Godspy?
faith article
spacer
spacer
<OPINION>
RELATED LINKS
Christianity and Gnosticism A Conflict About Method, by Lorenzo Albacete
In the Incarnation, salvation springs from the earth, from human flesh, from the very body despised by the Gnostics of The Da Vinci Code.

The Cry of Suffering, by Lorenzo Albacete
The redemption of suffering cannot be found as an "ultimate answer" to a problem: it can only be an event that transforms the drama of suffering into a drama of love and shows love to be more powerful than its denial.

Faith, Politics and the Scandal of Christ, by Msgr Lorenzo Albacete
The national chaplain for the international Catholic lay movement 'Communion and Liberation' explains their 2004 election statement: 'A Call to Freedom,' and why Jesus Christ is the answer to the problem of religion and politics.

Catholic Priests: A New Beginning, by Lorenzo Albacete
The present scandal was brought about by a betrayal of the "nothingness" of celibacy, of virginity for the kingdom.

Guilt & Wonder, by Lorenzo Albacete
The experience of complete forgiveness follows the experience of a love offered unconditionally, "while we were still God's enemies," as St Paul writes.

John Paul II and the Gospel of Peace, by Lorenzo Albacete
Is John Paul II the Catholic Ghandi? Does he want Catholics to be pacifists?

The Evidence of the Resurrection, by Lorenzo Albacete
What will convince the world about Jesus is the way we love one another. A capacity to love that would be impossible if Jesus had not conquered death.

Faith and Doubt at Ground Zero: Interview with Lorenzo Albacete
“If I thought what we saw on Sept. 11, the dreadful and horrible possibilities of religion, were the only face of religion, I assure you I'd take off this collar. There is another face—maybe harder to see after Sept. 11 and what has followed it—but it's there. I see it every Sunday.”  [PBS/Frontline]

Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America

Communion & Liberation
International Catholic lay movement that engages contemporary culture.

Ecclesia de Eucharistia
Pope John Paul II's Encyclical on the Eucharist

In the ruins of the future
The World Trade Centre attack was the defining moment of the year—and will haunt us for decades. Don DeLillo on the terror that overturned history. [The Guardian]

Lorenzo Albacete on The New Pope and the Future of the Church, by Charlie Rose
Who is Benedict XVI, and where does he want to take the Catholic Church? On the day the new pope was elected, Charlie Rose interviewed Monsignor Lorenzo Albacete, a leading Catholic theologian and a friend of John Paul II, and asked him that question. The answers may surprise you.

The Towers and the Church, by Paul Chu
God, Eternity and Ground Zero

Traces Magazine
Monthly magazine about faith and culture published by the Communion & Liberation movement.

Traces Magazine
The international magazine of the lay movement Communion and Liberation.

ADVERTISEMENTS
Click here to buy the movie...
 
 
 
 
 
 
Click here to see the video!
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Click here to buy!
 
 
 
Click Here to Order!
 
 
 
Click here to buy!
 
 
 
 
 
 

The Elephant in the Room: Ground Zero, Three Years Later

We will not understand our present situation adequately if we fail to perceive its basis as a religious war. In the end, our future depends on the encounter between religion, critical reasoning, and humility.

Lorenzo Albacete


Last year, on September 11, 2003, the President of New York University, John Sexton, hosted a special dinner in the lobby of a historic building located in downtown New York's government and business district, next to "Ground Zero" in lower Manhattan. The purpose of the dinner was to gather a "cross-section of New Yorkers coming together with political leaders to assess, after two years, the lessons of 9/11 for New York City, the nation, and the world."

The dinner was entirely video-taped by PBS-TV in order to be shown later as a two-hour documentary special on "September 11 and the Future of the West." The guest list was impressive. It included Raymond W. Kelly, New York City's Police Commissioner; Paul McHale, the second in command at the new Federal Department for Homeland Defense; Robert Morgenthau, District Attorney for New York County; Jessica Stern, Harvard professor and terrorism expert; and prominent journalists (Calvin Trillin of the New Yorker; Fareed Zakaria, Chief Editor of Newsweek International; Ti-Hua Chang, correspondent for NBC-TV news; and Rossana Rosado, publisher of the oldest Hispanic daily in the United States); as well as authors (like Salman Rushdie), scientists, and business leaders.

I was invited to attend the dinner as "a prominent Catholic educator and scholar, and as commentator of the role of religion in terrorism."

It became immediately clear that we were facing two hours of old, pre-packaged opinions challenged by other, opposing pre-packaged opinions.
Since most of us did not know each other very well, I thought it would take long before the conversation would pick up. However, the conversation was in fact heated almost from the very beginning. All day long, the City had been commemorating the second anniversary of the terrorist attack, and these "expert guests" seemed anxious to make their pronouncements.

It became immediately clear that we were facing two hours of old, pre-packaged opinions challenged by other, opposing pre-packaged opinions. At no time did anyone give evidence of having changed his mind or penetrated more deeply into the subject. From the outset, it was mostly a discussion about politics.

NYU President Sexton, a Catholic lawyer with a degree in religious studies, tried numerous times to bring the conversation to a deeper level of discourse, but it quickly returned again to the usual themes: unilateralism vs. multilateralism, globalization, US arrogance, Arab resentment, poverty and hopelessness, racism and loss of civil liberties, and comparison with casualties in other terrorist attacks, tragedies, genocides, and even traffic accidents.

The mood was certainly anti-Bush Administration, with the exception of the Assistant Secretary for Homeland Defense and New York City' s Police Commissioner. As to the non-political types, Iranian-American artist Shiria Neshat bemoaned discrimination at airport security checks, and Professor Jessica Stern (author of Terror in the Name of God) did not pursue the connection between religion and terrorism but concentrated instead on the humiliation that the modern age had inflicted on the Arab world.

The representatives of the business world were remarkably subdued, except a member of the prestigious "Council on Foreign Relations," who questioned the seriousness of war leaders who asked the people to "sacrifice" by spending more money in order to spur the economy and show the terrorists that we were not intimidated.

The only difference was Salman Rushdie, who, frankly, seemed out of place in a discussion like this one. Early on, he insisted on the need to understand the present religious situation of Islam and the internal struggles for its future. It seemed he was suggesting that the "future of the West" was tied to this struggle between modernity and a religion that had yet to go through the encounter with critical thinking and tolerance.

The human vocation to the Infinite had been effectively suppressed by modern criticism and, instead of disappearing, it had struck back with a deadly force.
Toward the end of the dinner, sometime between the "Tribeca Grill" and the "Warm Apple Tart with Vanilla Ice Cream," President Sexton asked me to more or less try to summarize the new insights learned from the conversation (providing more or less the "exalted" view "from the perspective of eternity, I guess), but since I had not discovered any new insight so far, I repeated again what I had said before, namely, that we would not understand our present situation adequately if we failed to perceive its basis as a religious war.

The human vocation to the Infinite had been effectively suppressed by modern criticism and, instead of disappearing, it had struck back with a deadly force. The proper response, I suggested, was not further suppression of the religious instinct, but its adequate education by insistence on the requirements of reason and a humble respect for a non-syncretistic pluralism based on true religious liberty.

Salman Rushdie exclaimed: "We have all failed tonight to see the elephant in the room [a reference, I imagine, to the famous Buddhist parable]. Only the Monsignor has described it adequately. In the end, our future depends on the encounter between religion, critical reasoning, and humility." 

spacer
September 8, 2004

MONSIGNOR LORENZO ALBACETE is National Director of the ecclesial movement Communion & Liberation.

Reprinted with permission from Traces Magazine. All rights reserved.

Email A Friend
READER COMMENTS
09.16.04   spy1 says:
The main reason terrorists hate the U.S. isn’t because we're arrogant (as liberals like to say) nor because we're free (as conservatives like to say). They hate us because we support their enemy, Israel.

09.11.04   alexander caughey says:
That life is about choice and that choice is about recognising the differences that do not exist between the races that occupy our planet. That in recognising that life is about choosing between that which is not in being, rather in our perception, must also suggest that our view of reality is being coloured by our willingness to see that which is clearly not and yet is, by our choice of it being so. When we choose to see the reality of there being no differences between races, for there is only the human race, we have chosen to believe in reality rather than our perception of reality. Until we change the view that blocks our vision of that which is real, we will be obliged to continue living in a world of self imposed barriers of division, erected by the blind to enable all who are willing to see, to be blinded by hate, ignorance and an insecurity born of our unwillingness to trust our fellow human creation. That the needs of the human race are the genesis of finding common purpose, through sharing our benefits, might well suggest that investment in the improvement of the life of all in need, might well improve their lives and their need to be envious of those whom they presume to be in oversupply of that which they presume to need.Yet, so often, it is those in apparent over supply who are in dire need, for they lack the vision to see the solution to the very real problems of terrorism, can only be met by changing the blindness that besets those whose own vision for a better life, is being fashioned out of their lack of vision for their real needs. In sharing, the scales of blindness automatically drop into the balancing action of understanding that will resolve that which is waiting to be resolved, by our own sacrifice of all that blinds our field of vision of a better future for all who are our brothers and sisters in the harmony of the human race.

09.08.04   Godspy says:
We will not understand our present situation adequately if we fail to perceive its basis as a religious war. In the end, our future depends on the encounter between religion, critical reasoning, and humility.

Click to buy at Amazon.com!
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Advertise | About Us