|
RELATED LINKS |
|
The Transfiguration: Trinkets on Mt Tabor, by John Zmirak and Denise Matychowiak
|
The Transfiguration reminds us that God left the apostles with no excuse for doubt. The Father spelled things out, as if to ask, “What part of ‘THIS IS MY SON’ don't you understand?” |
|
|
Celebrating ‘All Hallow’s Eve’: The Seven Deadly Courses, by John Zmirak and Denise Matychowiak
|
This Halloween recall the festival's sacred roots by dressing as your favorite soul in purgatory and serving up these seven deadly courses. |
|
|
Dark Young Thoughts: A Review of the film, ‘Bright Young Things,’ by John Zmirak
|
For all his cultural libertinism, director Stephen Fry imbues his new film, 'Bright Young Things'— an adaptation of Evelyn Waugh’s 'Vile Bodies'— with more of a Christian spirit than Waugh’s pre-Catholic novel ever had. |
|
|
Pentecost: Because Fire is Cool, by John Zmirak and Denise Matychowiak
|
We like to celebrate the birthday of the Church with fire, fancy, and foreigners…Try these flambé recipes and risky (if not quite risqué) games. |
|
|
The Unbearable Reality of Love: The Passion of The Christ, by John Zmirak
|
In this film we see with unbearable clarity how Jesus descended into the personal Hell each of us carries around - and purged it clean. |
|
|
Top Ten Things for Mediocre Catholics to Give Up for Lent, by John Zmirak and Denise Matychowiak
|
Did your Lenten penances get lost in the desert? On April 1st, here are one bad Catholic’s ideas for making Holy Week suitably grim. |
|
|
Fathers, Sons, Feuds and Myths: An interview with Alexander Waugh
|
"Alexander believes that the banana story was true: 'He was a very greedy little boy, and he definitely would have remembered the bananas and he definitely would have resented them. But my point in the book is that you cannot trust the testimony of a very greedy jam tart thief, who would rather have a jam tart than meet his father.'" [Telegraph] |
|
|
Gunpowder Plot 400
|
|
|
|
Interview with Stephen Fry
|
"'I would, in a sense, not hold my hand up to being a full artist. I think there are artists with a capital 'A.' There are people who are utterly uncompromising. I'm much more of an entertainer. I like to engage and to provoke. I certainly don't want to be formulaic.'" [Onion] |
|
|
Preaching with a Punchline: An interview with John Zmirak and Denise Matychowiak, Patrick Novecosky
|
John Zmirak and Denise Matychowiak admit to being bad Catholics. But they're in good company, they say - Mother Teresa was a self-professed bad Catholic, too. Which means they're really good Catholics? Whatever. The duo has teamed up to write 'The Bad Catholic's Guide to Good Living'— a zany but reverent guide to Catholic life and celebrations. |
|
|
The Bad Catholic's Guide to Good Living
|
by John Zmirak and Denise Matychowiak [Amazon] |
|
|
The President and the Pope: Reading the Signs of the Times, by John Zmirak
|
Ronald Reagan and Pope John Paul II shared more than a distaste for communism. They shared an ability to read the signs of the times and act accordingly. |
|
|
|
|
ADVERTISEMENTS |
|
| |
November 5, Guy Fawkes Day: Go Out with a Bang
Every Nov. 5th the English celebrate the day in 1605 that Catholic conspirator Guy Fawkes and friends—a group we might call Al-Chiesa—tried and failed to blow up Parliament. This year marks the 400th anniversary. There's no reason Catholics can't enjoy it too—while giving it a bit of a twist.
By John Zmirak and Denise Matychowiak
|
You've probably heard a good deal about the persecution of Catholics over the centuries in Britain—enough to realize that we're still pretty pissed off on the subject.
Throughout the 16th and much of the 17th century, Catholic priests were hunted down by secret police and tortured to death, and laymen executed, imprisoned, or bankrupted through ruinous fines by a viciously intolerant Protestant English government.
With the death of Queen Elizabeth I, and the accession of James I, English Catholics had reason to hope that the repression they suffered might be eased. After all, his wife was a Catholic, and he was the son of Mary Queen of Scots, who lost her throne and her life in large part because of her faith. James made ambiguous noises about suspending the slaughter of priests and prosecution of laymen.
They were quickly disappointed. Once James had consolidated his hold on the throne, he courted popularity among Protestants by continuing the persecution of Catholics—excepting only a few royal favorites.
|
As dinner unfolds, tell the story of Guy Fawkes—then for dessert take the gingerbread parliament outside, stuff it with M-80 fireworks, and blow it all to hell.
|
November 5th marks the day that some of those English Catholics decided to try biting back. On that date in 1605, the bold conspirators Guy Fawkes and Robert Catesby, along with a dozen or so of their friends—a group we might call Al-Chiesa—planned to blow up the English houses of Parliament, wiping out the entire political elite of the country, including the royal family, at one fell swoop. They then planned an uprising of Catholics across the country, intended to install a friendlier monarch on the throne.
The plan came achingly close to success, but was foiled at the last minute when one of the "friendly" lords whose life they tried to save by warning him snitched to the authorities. The conspirators were captured, tortured, and executed—and thousands of innocent, patriotic Catholics persecuted in the ensuing "war on terror."
To mark the occasion, English Protestants began to hold a bonfire on the anniversary of the plot's discovery, creating a stuffed effigy of Fawkes, and burning it festively this night, accompanying the flames with fireworks, drinking and general celebration. Sometimes instead of Fawkes they would burn the pope in effigy—a custom still popular in Northern Ireland.
CELEBRATE:
While this day is not part of the Church's liturgical calendar, there's no reason we can't enjoy it—albeit giving the holiday a bit of a twist. Why not get the baking enthusiasts in your family (i.e. the girls) to make a House of Parliament out of gingerbread? Find pictures of these exquisite gothic buildings on the Internet, and make the best copy you can, lovingly adding details with icing, perhaps even forming a tiny King James I out of marzipan. Unveil it at the outset of tonight's family dinner-or at a gathering of friends. As dinner unfolds, tell the story of Guy Fawkes and his friends—then for dessert take the gingerbread parliament outside, stuff it with M-80 fireworks, and blow it all to hell. | October 28, 2005
|
From "A Bad Catholic’s Guide to Good Living" (Crossroad Publishing, 2005) by John Zmirak and Denise Matychowiak.
©2005, John Zmirak and Denise Matychowiak. All rights reserved.
|
|
READER COMMENTS |
|
11.12.06 yenta says:
|
Second attempt to post a comment here, so forgive me if it comes up twice. Just wanted to point out that if you are going to make gingerbread effigies of the HoP, get the architecture right! Those gorgeous gothic buildings went up a wee while later than the reign of James I. Unless of course you are also expressing a strong aversion to Pugin. |
|
|
11.22.05 kenwolman says:
|
Okay, now I (maybe) get it. Tongue in cheek, etc., etc. Sorta. I do recall the good fortune of (1) American POWs and (2) various Jesuits, including Fr. Pedro Arrupe, who had front row seats at the bombing of Hiroshima on 8/6/45. I suppose we had to make a choice, even knowing that some of our own guys were trapped there. Greatest good for the greatest number, etc. Why does the whole tower of rationalizations come across as madly hollow? |
|
|
11.22.05 kenwolman says:
|
The idea of blowing Parliament to Hell is terribly clever, but I ask the right honourable gentleman author whether he remembers what the Catholics themselves, under the rule of Mary Tudor, did to the early-day Anglicans, call them Protestant, AngloCatholic, or Murray. All this proves to me is that anyone who can carry a grudge for over four centuries needs to get out more. |
|
|
11.05.05 Antigone says:
|
QuoteOriginally posted by: ZmirakBut on a more serious note: Is it wrong to use violence to overthrow tyrants? Was it wrong for Gen. von Stauffenberg to try to blow up Hitler, because one of the generals in the room might have been innocent of any involvement in the Holocaust? I agree it was wrong to target civilians in Hiroshima and Dresden, but if we had the chance to sink a ship with Hitler on it, would it have been wrong because there might have been innocent guys on there mopping the decks? When a government is persecuting the Church, with the death penalty for saying Mass, it’s ipso facto invalid, and deserves to be overthrown. The members of Parliament were directly involved in the persecution… so I say, “Bombs away!” Gray areas, I think. In some cases, yes, an act of violence is justifiable as an act of self-defense or to defend others. But who gets to define "tyrant"? (Keeping in mind that many very religious people around the world view the United States as a Great Satan.) And would blowing up Parliament have stopped the persecution of Catholics, or would it have enflamed anti-Catholic sentiments even more? Leading to even more widespread martyrdom and discrimination? Remembering too that English Catholics had blood on their hands during their times in political office (wasn't it Queen Mary who earned the "bloody" nick?).I don't know myself. As I said, gray areas. |
|
|
11.04.05 Greg says:
|
QuoteOriginally posted by: GodspyEvery Nov. 5th the English celebrate the day in 1605 that Catholic conspirator Guy Fawkes and friends—a group we might call Al-Chiesa—tried and failed to blow up Parliament. This year marks the 400th anniversary. There's no reason Catholics can't enjoy it too—while giving it a bit of a twist. |
|
|
11.03.05 Zmirak says:
|
Just for the record, I'm speaking on my own behalf here. Godspy has no plans whatsoever to assassinate King James I. |
|
|
11.03.05 Zmirak says:
|
Dear Greg,Well, first of all I was KINDA KIDDING. That’s sort of the tone of the whole book. But on a more serious note: Is it wrong to use violence to overthrow tyrants? Was it wrong for Gen. von Stauffenberg to try to blow up Hitler, because one of the generals in the room might have been innocent of any involvement in the Holocaust? I agree it was wrong to target civilians in Hiroshima and Dresden, but if we had the chance to sink a ship with Hitler on it, would it have been wrong because there might have been innocent guys on there mopping the decks? When a government is persecuting the Church, with the death penalty for saying Mass, it’s ipso facto invalid, and deserves to be overthrown. The members of Parliament were directly involved in the persecution… so I say, “Bombs away!” Cheers,John |
|
|
11.02.05 Greg says:
|
Are you serious? I am not sure. Blowing up Parliament would be an act of terrorism. Was every person present there culpable for the persecution of Catholics? I don't think so. Committing murder is not a good thing to celebrate, nor to joke about. I am very well aware of the suffering of English Catholics and I have a devotion to the English Martyrs, but I don't count Guy Fawkes among them. |
|
|
10.31.05 Godspy says:
|
Every Nov. 5th the English celebrate the day in 1605 that Catholic conspirator Guy Fawkes and friends—a group we might call Al-Chiesa—tried and failed to blow up Parliament. This year marks the 400th anniversary. There's no reason Catholics can't enjoy it too—while giving it a bit of a twist. |
|
|
|
|