|
karenanderson
Posts: 1
Joined: Oct 2005
|
October 30, 2005 6:23 AM
|
|
Dawn Eden has some decent critiques of Ariel Levy's "Female Chauvanist Pigs," but then she goes and commits the same error. With supernatural insight, she claims at the end of her review to know not only the secret desires of "employees of the strip-club industry fueling" the raunch culture (a completely unsubstantiated claim begging the chicken or the egg question...), but of ALL WOMEN SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL -- "a loving husband." Um. That's just not true. Can we have some of the citations and studies she asks of Ariel Levy? Or is it supposed to be an unimpeachable fact that marriage is always good for, and desired by, women? I'm sorry, I know it would help traditional marriage advocates to believe that all women need for liberation is to get married, but for many of us, given the ugly history of marriage as an oppressive institution legitimizing the sale, abuse, and slavery of women, marriage is not redemption. Dawn Eden's utopian illusions of strippers secretly hoping a good man will make a decent woman of them don't take the place of actual sociological research.
|
|
|
|
|