Click here to read more...
 
 
 
March 27, 2008
Newsletter:     
Search:        
 
Click Here to Order!
 
 
 
 
Return to Home Page Doctrine, Scripture, Morality, Vocation, Community Identity, Sexuality, Family, Healing, Work Art, Ideas, Technology, Science, Business Politics, Bioethics, Ecology, Justice, Peace Spirituality, Prayers, Poems, and Witness Archive of top news from around the web Columns, Reviews and Personal Essays Share your opinions, ideas, and experiences What is Godspy?
GODSPY Discussion Forums
Members must log-in before posting. If you are not a member, click here to join. Take a moment to read our frequently asked questions. And check the today page for announcements from the editors.



Navigation:


FORUMS > CULTURE
Replying to Thread: Transubstantiating the Culture: Andy Warhol's Secret  [Feature]
Created On November 12, 2003 1:55 PM by Godspy


Username:
Password:

Remember my login



Forget your login information?





Godspy

Posts: 13
Joined: Sep 2003

November 12, 2003 1:55 PM

User is offline View thread in raw text format

More than one seemingly religious person's secret sins have been exposed at their death; Warhol's secrets were that he went to church and served at a soup kitchen. <BR>

Reply
Quote
Top
Bottom



metameta

Posts: 11
Joined: Oct 2003

November 18, 2003 9:57 AM

User is offline View users profile View thread in raw text format

The article raises many interesting points. I must confess to being a cultural illiterate. Without being able to see the cited art of Warhol, I find the claim that Warhol's art is intrinsically Catholic hard to accept.

-------------------------
MJ
http://realphysics.blogspot.com/

Reply
Quote
Top
Bottom



Campionite

Posts: 2
Joined: Dec 2003

December 12, 2003 8:09 PM

User is offline View users profile View thread in raw text format

I tend to agree, but I haven't studied Warhol in depth either. There is a sort of disdain towards Warhol in particular from those disaffected from pop art in general that I'm guilty of (though not wholesale, as it were). Quite honestly, his work has always seemed flat, maybe a layer deep, but more slightly clever than deep (gold dust for a rich man, gaudy makeup for a beauty).

If this article's right, though, his work jumps into three dimensions. Taking a look at the Last Supper portraits linked to from the article, one of the first things you might notice is that the closups of Jesus have three colored films, which immediately makes a Catholic think of the Trinity. And so it could be a discrete acknowledgement of Christ's intimate union with the whole Trinity (via the personage of the Word). Symbolism of this sort is probably a bit beneath or beyond, depending on your viewpoint, pop art, however. Especially if you try to extend the analogy to the whole view of the Last Supper. Perhaps a trinitarian view of God working in things, right? But there's four colors. The green is stark and individual, perhaps that should be the human apart from divine, something divorced from what's going on there. Judas! Yeah, that would explain it. But Judas is actually intersected with purple and yellow, as is Jesus and Peter and John... (if I remember my Who's Who correctly)

Rather, to me, it simply seems to outline the different groupings in the picture according to whose eyes/hands are directed towards Jesus and how. And at that, not completely. So...what?

Maybe if we knew how he used color it would be clearer. There are other possible explanations, but they rest on being totally convinced that they actually *mean* something. I simply have no idea.

Reply
Quote
Top
Bottom



laborec

Posts: 2
Joined: Feb 2006

May 11, 2006 2:56 AM

User is offline View thread in raw text format

This article for me - a Slovak Ruthene (just like Andy was) is a very helpful source of knowledge about Andy.. I really have not known that he was religious.

-------------------------
God Spy is a good and helpful forum and source. Thank you.

Reply
Quote
Top
Bottom



Judy77

Posts: 1
Joined: Aug 2004

September 21, 2006 8:42 PM

User is offline View thread in raw text format

The fact that Warhol went to church was well established even at the height of his early fame. But nobody would investigate this aspect of his life due to the "bad boy" persona necessary to becoming a famous artist in those days. Thirty years later, it is good to see that new art historian/critics like Jane Daggett Dillenberger, author of the forthcoming "The Religious Art of Andy Warhol," are willing to explore the profound complexities at the core of Warhol's predicament. It appears that his priest/advisors were willing to abide with him rather than judge him or pressure him into orthodoxy. Whatever else he might have been, he changed the art world by allowing himself to become a screen for other people's projections. Prior to his career, artists were philosophers and their works were emblems of their beliefs whether or not they were in control of thier lives. After Andy, that changed. Now artists became more passive about what we make of them.

Reply
Quote
Top
Bottom

You are in message post mode [ FORUMS : THREADS ]
Click to buy at Amazon.com!
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Advertise | About Us

FuseTalk 3.1 - Copyright � 1999-2002 e-Zone Media Inc. All rights reserved.